Introduction: Why “Standard” Lasso Sometimes Falls Short
Regularisation is central to building reliable statistical and machine learning models, especially when the number of features is large or features are correlated. Lasso (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) is popular because it does two jobs at once: it shrinks coefficients to prevent overfitting and can set some coefficients exactly to zero, giving built-in feature selection. That makes Lasso a practical default in many linear modelling pipelines.
However, standard Lasso applies the same penalty strength to every coefficient. In real datasets, not all features deserve equal treatment. Some signals are strong and stable, while others are weak or noisy. When all coefficients are penalised equally, Lasso may shrink important coefficients too aggressively or select the wrong feature among correlated alternatives. Adaptive Lasso was introduced as a refinement to address this limitation. For learners in a Data Scientist Course, Adaptive Lasso is a valuable topic because it shows how a small change in regularisation design can improve both selection accuracy and coefficient estimation.
What Is Adaptive Lasso?
Adaptive Lasso modifies the classic Lasso penalty by introducing feature-specific weights. Instead of penalising every coefficient the same way, it assigns different penalty weights to different coefficients.
The key idea is simple:
- If a feature is likely important, penalise it less.
- If a feature is likely unimportant, penalise it more.
In practice, Adaptive Lasso starts by fitting an initial model to get a rough estimate of coefficients (this first estimate can come from ordinary least squares when possible, or from ridge regression when multicollinearity exists). The magnitude of these initial coefficients is then used to compute weights. Features with larger initial coefficients receive smaller weights, so they are less likely to be shrunk to zero in the final model.
This approach often improves feature selection because it treats strong signals more gently and weak signals more harshly.
Why Adaptive Weights Improve Feature Selection
To understand why Adaptive Lasso can be more accurate, it helps to consider two common Lasso pain points:
1) Bias in Coefficient Estimates
Lasso shrinks coefficients toward zero. This shrinkage reduces variance but introduces bias. If a truly important feature is heavily penalised, its coefficient can be underestimated. Adaptive Lasso reduces this bias by applying smaller penalties to coefficients that appear important in the initial fit.
2) Instability with Correlated Features
When features are correlated (common in marketing, finance, and sensor data), Lasso may arbitrarily pick one feature and drop the other, even if both contain useful signal. Adaptive Lasso can improve stability by reducing the chance that a strong feature gets eliminated simply because it competes with a correlated neighbour.
For those building modelling fundamentals in a Data Science Course in Hyderabad, this is a practical lesson: feature selection is not only about sparsity. It is about selecting the right features consistently while keeping coefficients meaningful.
How Adaptive Lasso Works in a Modelling Workflow
A typical Adaptive Lasso workflow looks like this:
Step 1: Preprocess and Scale Features
As with Lasso, feature scaling is important because penalties interact with coefficient magnitudes. Standardising inputs helps ensure the regularisation behaves consistently.
Step 2: Fit an Initial Estimator
You fit a first-pass model to estimate coefficients. Common choices:
- Ordinary least squares (if the problem is well-conditioned)
- Ridge regression (often safer when there are many correlated predictors)
Step 3: Compute Adaptive Weights
Weights are typically constructed as a function of the initial coefficient magnitudes. Intuitively:
- Larger initial coefficient → smaller weight → lighter penalty
- Smaller initial coefficient → larger weight → heavier penalty
Step 4: Fit the Weighted Lasso
You then fit a Lasso-like model where each coefficient is penalised based on its weight. The overall penalty strength is still tuned, usually via cross-validation.
Step 5: Validate Both Prediction and Selection
Adaptive Lasso is used not just for predictive accuracy, but also for interpretability and stability. You typically evaluate:
- predictive performance on hold-out data
- number of selected features
- stability of selection across folds or bootstrap samples
- coefficient reasonableness and domain plausibility
This workflow fits naturally into the kind of end-to-end modelling pipeline taught in a Data Scientist Course, where you balance performance, interpretability, and robustness.
When Adaptive Lasso Is a Good Choice
Adaptive Lasso tends to be useful when:
- You want a sparse linear model for interpretability.
- You have many features and suspect only a subset truly matters.
- Correlation between features makes standard Lasso unstable.
- You care about both feature selection quality and coefficient accuracy.
It may be less suitable when:
- The underlying relationship is strongly non-linear and linear feature selection is not meaningful.
- You do not have enough data to reliably estimate initial weights.
- You already rely on non-linear models with built-in feature importance measures, although even then a sparse linear benchmark can be valuable.
Practical Considerations and Common Mistakes
A few important points to keep the method reliable:
- Choose the initial estimator carefully: If the initial coefficients are poor, the weights will be misleading. Ridge is often a robust starting point.
- Avoid data leakage: Compute weights only using training data within each cross-validation fold, not on the full dataset.
- Check stability: Sparse models can look convincing but be unstable. Stability checks reduce the risk of over-interpreting noise.
- Interpret coefficients cautiously: Even with better estimation, correlation can still complicate causal interpretation. Adaptive Lasso improves selection but does not magically create causal conclusions.
Conclusion: A Smarter Penalty for Better Selection
Adaptive Lasso refines standard Lasso by applying adaptive weights to each coefficient, allowing the model to penalise features unevenly based on evidence from an initial fit. This often leads to more accurate feature selection and less biased coefficient estimates, especially in high-dimensional or correlated settings.
For practitioners learning through a Data Science Course in Hyderabad, Adaptive Lasso is a strong example of how statistical thinking improves modelling outcomes. And for anyone progressing through a Data Scientist Course, it reinforces an important principle: regularisation is not one-size-fits-all,carefully designed penalties can make models both more interpretable and more reliable.
ExcelR – Data Science, Data Analytics and Business Analyst Course Training in Hyderabad
Address: Cyber Towers, PHASE-2, 5th Floor, Quadrant-2, HITEC City, Hyderabad, Telangana 500081
Phone: 096321 56744